Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Carsten,
> I hope that you can all agree with my conclusion. If not, than I am
> confident that with time you will realize just how important today's
> decision was.
I do agree with you. I only use a tiny subset of org's features:
Outlining, TODOs, Dates, some hyperlinks, the remember integration for
quick notes and tables. In fact, I converted all the few spreadsheet
tables I use to org-mode, because it offered everything I need and emacs
is always open.
So at least for me loosing the table editor would be sad.
I would suggest another refactoring:
- Make a subset of org the core which includes everything anybody
uses, e.g. the outlining, TODOs, dates, links...
- Everything else comes as plugin a user has to explicitly require in
his ~/.emacs.
- Use different keys for the plugins. For example each plugin could
have a customizable prefix for all its commands.
I think much of org's complexity comes from the fact, that you tried to
use only very few key bindings to DTRT. A bit exaggerated one could say
org is fully controllable with C-c C-c.
Bye,
Tassilo
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
