On 2008-06-09, Sebastian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just a question: > > When I follow the link you mentioned in your first mail I read this: > > ----8<------- > It should be noted that this does not imply any hostility towards the > Free Software Foundation, and does not mean that GFDL documentation > should not be considered free enough by others, and Debian itself will > continue distributing GFDL documentation in its non-free section. > ---->8------- > > Debain users are used to look for documentation non-free section (gcc, > bash, bison, auto-tools, glibc, php, gdb, emacs-lisp ...). Is it a > problem to simply put the docs there?
it means maintaining two source packages, which is far from optimal for something that moves as fast as org-mode. It could definitely be done, but I am not exactly thrilled by the idea :) Cheers, --Seb _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
