On 2015-09-24 04:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Applied. Thank you.
Thank you!
>
> Would it make sense to do the same for INCLUDE? If so, would you want to
> have a look at it?
A chain of #+INCLUDEs already works OK. I'll send a patch that tweaks
the test-org-export/expand-include test case to ensure that it continues
to work.
The intended meanings of #+INCLUDE and #+SETUPFILE have never been clear
to me, so I have a couple of questions:
* What is supposed to happen if you have a #+SETUPFILE that has
an #+INCLUDE?
* What is supposed to happen if you have an #+INCLUDE file that
has a #+SETUPFILE line?
-Richard
