cesar mena <cm...@pobox.com> writes: > > yes i suspect this is why it hasn't been reported in years. > > what say you nicolas?
Please do not top-post :) In any case, I'm not sure Samuel complains about the current behaviour. Actually, I don't understand what is meant by "the old behaviour" in this context. The behaviour changed a couple of times already in this thread. > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> fwiw, i am one who is so [disorganized?] that the old behavior is >> preferred. if something is a 6m repeater, and i ignore it for 6m, >> it's actually useful to be reminded after another repeat. perhaps >> more normal people would understand 1w. no matter how much i "should" >> mootify it or take it off the list or do it, this "bug" has proved >> useful in practice. >> >> i don't claim to represent hordes of disorganized people, but there you have >> it. Regards,
