Andreas Leha <andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes: > Generally, I think that caching is a sensitive area. And if we think > that it is unpredictable and advise people to stay off of it, we are > better off removing it than offering it in this state. At least until > it behaves (more) predictable.
Is it necessarily broken? I mean, if the hash contains the current parameters and contents of the current block, along with all hashes contents and parameters of related code blocks (i.e., called or referenced in the block), shouldn't it be predictable? Regards,
