Hi Joost, Org’s html export relies on the syntax of the source block being valid in the block’s language, for the corresponding emacs major mode to highlight it properly. In general, I wouldn’t rely on it behaving properly in the presence of unexpanded noweb references. That said...
2015ko azaroak 5an, Joost Helberg-ek idatzi zuen: > > ls, > > In the org-code below syntax highlighting in both code-blocks in the > emacs-buffer is fine, but the html-export only works nice in case of > using :noweb yes, the no-export option screws up syntax highlighting in > the html-output (two screenshots included). > > I understood that htmlize is used for html-export and that it honours > the faces in the emacs-buffer. It seems as if htmlize doesn't do this > after encountering the '>>' token. Your example works fine for me on latest org master. Can you send your org version? (M-x org-version) What happens if you insert the code for t1 into an sh-mode buffer: is it highlighted as expected? -- Aaron Ecay
