Hello,

Well, actually, it seems that I did not understand anything at all :-)
Sorry about that, but I am new to the source code, and it is not very clear
to me.

So if I try to summarize what I have got:
- In the past, what I could see with the standard 'M-x fill-region' over
paragraphs or lists with empty lines between each inner items, was probably
performed thanks to several calls to org-fill-paragraph. Removing the
org-fill-paragraph-separate-nobreak-p function simply highlights that I was
fortunate to use it this way before, and there is just no org-fill-region.
- There are no unit tests, nor past discussions about how different text
block contents should be filled with this new function

Please tell if I am still wrong, and otherwise I gonna try to implement
some unit tests over different cases I may think about.
Have a nice day,


2015-11-30 15:53 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>:

> Hello,
>
> Steve Moreau <moreau.st...@free.fr> writes:
>
> > Thanks for you answer.
> > OK, I understand. That explains why I needed to add blank lines between
> > list items before to fill region, such as:
> >
> >   - item1
> >
> >   - item2
> >
> >   This is a new paragraph
> >
> > I have 2 more questions for you please.
> > Let say I would like to give a hand and try to improve the
> org-fill-region
> > to deal with this case.
>
> Actually, there is nothing to improve. It needs to be built from
> scratch. There is no function in Org to fill a region ATM.
>
> > - Would it be local to fill-region only, as I would suspect, or would it
> > put a mess around because it is used in some other contexts I am not
> aware
> > of, and would it be something interesting for the org-mode according
> > to you?
>
> I think we should bind M-q to org-fill-paragraph. This function could
> delegate the work to `org-fill-region' when a region is active.
>
> > - If you wanted to develop it, would you surround it with a when
> condition
> > so that user can disable it?
>
> Why would someone want to disable it?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>
>

Reply via email to