On Thursday, 3 Dec 2015 at 18:31, John Kitchin wrote: > I clearly had some super important academic work to do today, so instead > I played around with citations ;)
Hey, I am doing just that right now ;-) > I am not yet convinced a citation processor will get us where we want > because of the complexity of the external dependencies, and the > potential/probable need for us to define new CSL files for different > backends, or at a minimum for org-formatted citations and > bibliographies. Hacking bst files is no fun, and it doesn't look like > CSL files are much better! Plus you have to find them and install them > somehow. I agree completely. I've looked at your web page for this. I like your solution. It is not complete but we know that a complete solution for citations, given all the weird and wonderful formats journals etc. expect, requires a very complex database of style information (witness bst and csl files). For a quick 'n' dirty solution, keeping to emacs lisp and org is very appealing. However, it is most appealing for those of us coming from the bibtex world... -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.2, Org release_8.3.2-363-g5c13a6
