Myles English <mylesengl...@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for looking at this again.
I'm just sorry about the delay, but I hope you can appreciate that
sometimes time is at a premium.
>> Is :with-location something you feel strongly about? I'm not sure I find
>> that it makes sense...
>>
>> I would like to apply the following patch on top of yours.
>
> I think that's alright.
>
> Just to recap: I use the "location" field, intended as a general purpose
> extension field, for bank details. Those details shouldn't be in every
> letter I write and I don't want to have to enter those details every
> time they are used. For those reasons I put the bank details in
> variable in a LCO file and toggle the inclusion by setting the
> :LOCATION: (or :EXPORT_LOCATION) property like this:
>
> :EXPORT_LOCATION: \usekomavar{frombank}
So if something should be in ALL letters the advised method would be to
use LCO file or set the location variable. I’m just concerned with having
too many variables. ox-koma-letter is already fairly complex.
It might make sense to NOT parse (i.e. interpret org syntax) the keyword
version or location then. Then you’d be able to add latex commands there.
The headline version would still be parsed.
Rasmus
--
Nothing's wrong with an email that ends in a minor key
