Hi Adam. Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> writes: >> Excuse me if this sounds almost philosophical, but in which situation an >> indirect buffer may be better that just focusing on the same (original) >> buffer? [...]
> [...] > So by jumping to an entry in an indirect buffer, I see only that entry, and > I can't modify any other nodes. It means I can treat each entry > independently, view and edit them separately, etc. > In this way it resembles the way Evernote presents notes independently, but > with all the power and flexibility of Org and Emacs. [...] > (I also confess that it gives me some peace of mind, because a few times I > have accidentally hit the wrong keys and deleted parts of an Org file that I > didn't mean to. Most of the time I immediately undo it and no harm is done, > but one time I didn't realize it until days or weeks later, and I had to > pull it out of an earlier commit in my org directory's git repo.) Crystal clear, thanks. :) Best... -- eduardo mercovich Donde se cruzan tus talentos con las necesidades del mundo, ahí está tu vocación.