Daniele Pizzolli <[email protected]> writes:
> Thanks Nicolas for the reply. Ok, but `org-babel-execute-buffer'
> produces an inconsistent document right now.
This is because you ask it to. See below.
> Mmm, the same reasoning can be used for arguing about the current
> behaviour: If I C-c C-c on a block, I expect only the code of the
> block to be executed, not some other part of the document I am
> editing. This behaviour will fix my issue.
You are explicitly asking for a re-execution of a remote source block:
:var DATA=pid
If you are only interested in the results, you should name them, and use
that instead, e.g.
#+NAME: pid
#+BEGIN_SRC shell :results value :cache no
printf '%s' "${$}"
#+END_SRC
The following result is usually outdated/inconsistent!
#+NAME: pid-result
#+RESULTS: pid
: 21867
#+NAME: echo-pid
#+BEGIN_SRC shell :var DATA=pid-result :results value
printf '%s' "${DATA}"
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: echo-pid
: 21867
Regards,
