Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > Adam Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> writes: > >> Marcin Borkowski <mbork <at> mbork.pl> writes: >> >>> https://vivaldi.com/ >>> >>> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >>> while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? >>> Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or >>> (hopefully) configurable ones. I, for one, would like to try it out, >>> though I do not have too high hopes. >> >> It looks interesting, but it's not free software, so I have no interest >> myself. Firefox/Iceweasel has been serving me well since before it was >> Firefox, and Pentadactyl has been my primary UI to it for a long time. I >> don't feel like Mozilla is taking it in a good direction anymore, but if it >> ever gets too bad, there's Iceweasel, and there's Pale Moon (which has >> committed to "classic" Firefox extension APIs and UI), and there are other >> alternatives like Conkeror, uzbl, etc. >> >> Even if you don't care about free software, Vivaldi is made by former Opera >> devs, so how do we know they aren't just repeating a cycle? It could go the >> same direction Opera went and need to be rebooted again. As long as it's >> proprietary, that's a risk its users will always face. > > I've been using Conkeror (based on Xulrunner/Firefox) for a while now, > and like it enough to stick with it. It's completely keyboard driven, > which I love. It's also not super stable, nor does it seem to be > actively maintained, which I don't love. If anyone has recommendations > for better keyboard-driven browsers, I'd love to hear them...
Maybe Firefox with keysnail. -- Sådan en god dansk lagereddike kan man slet ikke bruge mere