On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thursday, 26 May 2016 at 20:04, John Hendy wrote: > > [...] > >> Anyway, the point is that the repeater is built if there's any >> repetition frequency/interval. You also capture the "until" into >> rrend. So, the first date is going to feature a +unit, and this code >> adds the end: >> >> else if (rrend != "") >> date = date ">--<" rrend >> >> I just commented out both sections that add a "-- <date2>", the other >> checking for time2 being "". Is that the correct way to go about this? > > Well, I would simply not add the end information as org does not > understand an end date for a repeating item. In other words, for a > repeating item I would simply have the start date including the repeat > directive. >
Cool. Commenting has accomplished this for me and I don't get repeating entries anymore. >> Out of curiosity, how *is* the rrend code supposed to be handling >> these? Or what's the use case for building a <date1 +unit>--<date2>? > > I should say that the awk codes have diverged. My own version now > differs significantly from what is on Worg, which is where I assume you > got your copy. I implemented repeating entries differently, it would > seem. Ah, that makes more sense. I was confused about agreeing that an end date wasn't proper but the code having it. Is your original version anywhere handy? I tried searching but don't seem to find it. Thanks, John > > HTH, > eric > > -- > : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.94.1, Org release_8.3.4-869-gf2c421