Hi Nicolas,

So I will:

- add "org-babel-sql-convert-filename", so another name...I am thinking
- remove `msosql` support. I am been playing with the options for a while,
and I could not find a way the make osql output the same format as sqlcmd


Thanks,
David


On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:12 AM Xi Shen <davidshe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, I think it is better to let upstream function to resolve the path for
> org-mode.
>
> But I have never contacted Emacs developers before. Should I go through
> the bug-gnu-em...@gnu.org mail list? Or there's a more effective channel?
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:41 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Xi Shen <davidshe...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > According to
>> >
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Standard-File-Names.html
>> ,
>> > the `convert-standard-filename` works for *nix and MS-DOS, but not
>> Cygwin
>> > environment. And I tested, it does not work. For the prefix, please
>> advice
>> > me a better one. Maybe we should path this function first? How can I
>> > patch/update a Emacs native function?
>>
>> Since there is no module in Emacs, you need to prefix functions and
>> variables according to the package, or, even better, the library they
>> belong to.
>>
>> Hence, functions and variables in "ob-sql.el" are prefixed with
>> "org-babel-sql-".
>>
>> Do you mind discussing it upstream on emacs-devel ML first? I don't
>> think this kind of function belongs to Org. If upstream has no
>> equivalent and doesn't want to add one, we might consider adding it to
>> the library.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> >> > The `osql` command line tool was last updated in 2004,
>> >> > https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa214012(v=sql.80).aspx,
>> >> > and could not output the query result in a way that morden
>> >> > `org-table.el` expects.  The `sqlcmd` is the preferred command line
>> >> > tool to connect the Microsoft SQL Server and it also has a Linux
>> >> > version,
>> >> > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh568447(v=sql.110).aspx.
>> >>
>> >> Would it make sense to remove the msosql support then?
>> >>
>> > Yes, but I am also thinking about backward compatibility. Do you want
>> > me to create a patch to remove `msosql` support?
>>
>> AFAIU, according to your comment, "osql" output is barely usable. If you
>> think it is still usable and even used by some users, then I do not mind
>> keeping it. I just wanted to be sure we're not keeping something that is
>> not reasonable to keep.
>>
>> >> #'identity
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> OK, but what's the difference? Care to give me a short lesson?
>> >>>Thanks!
>>
>> Not much difference, hence the "nitpick" tag.
>>
>> 'identity is a generic symbol, #'identity clearly indicates we (the
>> user, the compiler) are interested in the symbol function cell.
>>
>> In this case, it is obvious, but it is not always the case in other
>> parts of the code base, and more consistency in the right direction
>> doesn't hurt.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas Goaziou
>>
>>
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> David S.
>
-- 

Thanks,
David S.

Reply via email to