Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > Konstantin Kliakhandler <ko...@slumpy.org> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> The unicode letters for 'varphi' and for 'phi' are swapped. >> >> Here is a patch correcting this: >> >> diff --git a/lisp/org-entities.el b/lisp/org-entities.el >> index 4044432..6f6d054 100644 >> --- a/lisp/org-entities.el >> +++ b/lisp/org-entities.el >> @@ -204,9 +204,8 @@ packages to be loaded, add these packages to >> `org-latex-packages-alist'." >> ("upsih" "\\Upsilon" t "ϒ" "upsilon" "upsilon" "ϒ") >> ("upsilon" "\\upsilon" t "υ" "upsilon" "upsilon" "υ") >> ("Phi" "\\Phi" t "Φ" "Phi" "Phi" "Φ") >> - ("phi" "\\phi" t "φ" "phi" "phi" "φ") >> - ("varphi" "\\varphi" t "ϕ" "varphi" "varphi" "ɸ") >> + ("phi" "\\phi" t "φ" "phi" "phi" "ɸ") >> + ("varphi" "\\varphi" t "ϕ" "varphi" "varphi" "φ") > > It's not straight forward. > > The behavior is "correct" with reference to (La)TeX. E.g. > > M-x set-input-method RET TeX RET > > Then, > > \phi → φ > \varphi → ϕ >
That's not what Lamport says (p.41, 2nd ed.) Maybe the input method got it wrong? > Your suggestion is correct with reference to HTML. > > I’d tend to favor the TeX interpretation even if it’s technically wrong. > > Rasmus -- Nick