Bastien, could you or someone else please look into this and provide
your comments? TIA.
> From: Paul Rankin <he...@paulwrankin.com>
> Cc: 24...@debbugs.gnu.org, firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:38:55 +1000
> Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:25 +0300:
> > > From: Paul Rankin <he...@paulwrankin.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:56:13 +1000
> > > Cc: 24...@debbugs.gnu.org
> > >
> > > >> The fix seems trivial to me so I'm wondering if there is anything
> > > >> holding it
> > > >> up from being included in 25?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, the fact that Emacs 25 is for all practical purposes already
> > > > released.
> > >
> > > Okay. 25.2?
> > I don't see why not, provided that Org developers give us their
> > blessing. Please bring this to their attention on the Org list, or
> > ask them to speak up here. I don't want us to make any changes that
> > could adversely affect Org without consulting them first.
> Dear Org Mode maintainers,
> Looping you in on a proposed bug fix for `outline-invisible-p'.
> Briefly, the problem is the function returns non-nil for any invisible
> text property when it should only do so for the outline property. As a
> defsubst, it is difficult to patch for other affected programs.
> Diff pasted:
> --- /usr/local/Cellar/emacs/25.1-rc2/share/emacs/25.1/lisp/outline.el.gz
> +++ #<buffer outline.el.gz>
> @@ -388,9 +388,9 @@
> nil 'move))
> (defsubst outline-invisible-p (&optional pos)
> - "Non-nil if the character after POS is invisible.
> + "Non-nil if the character after POS has outline invisible property.
> If POS is nil, use `point' instead."
> - (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible))
> + (eq (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible) 'outline))
> (defun outline-back-to-heading (&optional invisible-ok)
> "Move to previous heading line, or beg of this line if it's a heading.
> Diff finished. Sat Sep 3 14:35:22 2016