Hello, Jorge <jorge13...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 29 September 2016 at 17:36, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: >> I think "grandparent" is correct. In the following document >> >> * H1 >> ** H2 >> Text<--point >> >> "H2" is the parent headline of "Text" and as a consequence, "H1" is its >> grandparent. > What if point is in the headline, which is often the case? Besides the > docstring is inconsistent: > With two universal prefix arguments, insert the heading at the end > of the grandparent subtree. For example, if point is within a > 2nd-level heading, then it will insert a 2nd-level heading at the > end of the 1st-level parent heading. > > In the first sentence it says "grandparent subtree", whereas in the second > sentence it says "parent heading". And the manual says "parent": > Calling this command with `C-u C-u' will unconditionally respect > the headline's content and create a new item at the end of the > parent subtree. In this case, both "parent" and "grandparent" are confusing terms. I made a change to M-RET docstring, hopefully eschewing the confusion. Please let me know if there is still something wrong there. > But I still ask you to look at the other points I made about that manual > section: that it doesn't adequately explain the effect of C-u M-RET, and that > the description of C-RET is actually wrong. I overlooked that part. Fixed. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou