I usually just put a headline at the end, titled "end" or "local variables", etc.., and tagged noexport,
John ----------------------------------- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: > Hello, > > Marco Wahl <marcowahls...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I have the same issue. Currently I try to have an extra eye on the > > bottommost org tree. I also use an extra tag to mark the org tree which > > should be bottommost. I also use the idea stated in > > http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg106940.html which > sorts > > the wanted org tree to the bottom when sorting. > > > > For me this works reasonably well. > > > > When you put the local variables to the top of the file you are on the > > save side AFAICT. > > > > I try to avoid too much information in the first line. I prefer to have > > the variables at the bottom. > > Local variables at the end of the buffer are, indeed, a bit painful to > handle under Org. Org Footnote handles them reasonably well, I think, > but that's about it. > > I would welcome a general solution to this, as long as it does not > impede speed of most basic Org commands. > > Do you have an idea about it? Maybe a start would be to have a dedicated > Org version of `outline-next-heading' that moves before local variables > when it reaches the end of the buffer. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou > >
