Hello, Carsten Dominik <domi...@uva.nl> writes:
> Another way to implement this would be to use different VALUES for the > DATE_TREE/WEEK_TREE property - maybe that would actually be a somewhat > cleaner implementation. I think ":DATE_TREE: week" ":DATE_TREE: t" is cleaner, indeed. > I'll rethink that and I will also define a test. I also agree there's an opportunity to refactor this and come out with a more generic interface. Yet another option is to define new capture targets, e.g. - file+datetree+olp - file+datetree+olp+date - file+datetree+regexp - file+datetree+regexp+date - ... - file+weektree+olp - ... Those would ignore WEEK_TREE and DATE_TREE properties altogether. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
