John Wiegley <jwieg...@gmail.com> writes: > OK, to continue the analogy, what is the right answer? Technically it > doesn't seem as though Django belongs there, even if culturally it > sounds hard to separate. Should it stay indefinitely, or should the > development model change?
If somebody genuinely offered to take over, say, rmail, and maintain it separately, and handle bug reports, and, like, be the maintainer, that would be a help. Great, go ahead, and put the resulting thing in ELPA. But nobody has made that offer? Or have they, and I just missed it? I fail to see how just shuffling rmail from Emacs to ELPA helps us in any way with the maintainership. Instead it creates an extra burden on us, since we (in addition to all the normal maintainership) will also have to consider Emacs version compatibility. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
