Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > On Thursday, 16 Feb 2017 at 14:48, Nick Dokos wrote: > > [...] > >> I don't understand this: why is it easier if the buffer is read-only? >> Don't you still have to do M-x kill-buffer? > > IIUC, it's not so much read-only as a special mode where a single 'q' > will bury the buffer (or delete it, maybe). Sort of like docview or > what read-only views give.
Ok - thanks! -- Nick
