Ah okay it's my misunderstanding then.  I'm trying to refresh the local
setup to apply a different set of header args to that tree.

After some research it looks like I should just be calling
org-mode-restart.  Does that seem correct?

Thanks,
Kevin


On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:13 AM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Kevin Foley <kfole...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I've attached an ECM and below is my attempt at the backtrace.  Let me
> know
> > if I missed something.
> >
> > * org-at-property-p()
> > * #[0 "\301 \204 \302\303!\210\304\305!\306 \210\307\310 \311#8\204
> > \302\312 \"\210\313 !\207" [org-columns-current-fmt-compiled
> > org-at-property-p user-error "Not at a property"
> match-string-no-properties
> > 2 org-columns-get-format-and-top-level 3 assoc-string t "No operator
> > defined for property %s" org-columns-compute] 6
> > ("/home/kevin/.emacs.d/lib/org/lisp/org.elc"
> > . 550375) nil]()
> > * apply(#[0 "\301 \204 \302\303!\210\304\305!\306 \210\307\310 \311#8\204
> > \302\312 \"\210\313 !\207" [org-columns-current-fmt-compiled
> > org-at-property-p user-error "Not at a property"
> match-string-no-properties
> > 2 org-columns-get-format-and-top-level 3 assoc-string t "No operator
> > defined for property %s" org-columns-compute] 6
> > ("/home/kevin/.emacs.d/lib/org/lisp/org.elc"
> > . 550375) nil] nil)
> > * org-compute-property-at-point()
> >   funcall-interactively(org-compute-property-at-point)
> >   call-interactively(org-compute-property-at-point)
> >   org-property-action()
> >   funcall-interactively(org-property-action)
> >   call-interactively(org-property-action)
> >   org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c(nil)
> >   funcall-interactively(org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c nil)
> >   call-interactively(org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c nil nil)
> >   command-execute(org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c)
>
> AFAIU, when you are offered the `org-property-action' menu, you press
> "c", for `org-compute-property-at-point'.
>
> As a consequence, the error is expected since there is nothing to
> compute here. What did you expect instead?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>
-- 
Thanks,
Kevin Foley

Reply via email to