>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello, > Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes: >> If you want to implement the second feature differently, because of >> maintain reasons that sound reasonable, but please don't simple remove >> the second feature. > Then I'll just drop this branch. I'm against having the same (sub-set of > a) feature implemented in two different ways. That is a real pity! So in master we have the feature of narrowing one column to a width we want. That is useful in scenario 1. Now in the branch there is another *very nice* feature, which allows you to hide many columns on the fly. That is useful in scenario 2. So you are saying we cannot have both. I still have your patch and use it often, I really don't want to miss it, since it enhance the features of the table very much. It is a pity that you won't conserve that. I hope that patch can survive in the future. > I still think width cookies in their current state are wrong since > they really do two different things. But couldn't the feature of shrink one particular wide column to a certain width be implemented using your new implementation? Thank you very much for you work and I still hope this can somehow be saved and merged into master. Regards Uwe