2017-08-03 0:12 GMT+02:00 Tim Cross <theophil...@gmail.com>:
> Probably no real help, but win10 is (or soon will be) bundling in bash
> shell, which may address many of the reasons to use Cygwin. From posts
> I've seen on a number of lists, I would not be surprised to see cygwin
> slowly decline into obscurity. I see little interest in the emacs devel
> list for cygwin since the native windows version has matured (and it has
> been suggested, is the largest emacs user base).
> I am a Windows user (very long time) and Cygwin has never been an option
Native Emacs works pretty well under Windows.
There is only one drawback: it is slow (slower than linux) at running
external processes and some emacs packages do that pretty heavily
I have seen reports of slower startup times with the native Windows emacs
than with Linux, however I have not
been able to reproduce them (for example using helm default config or
Depending on wheter you use a 32 bits emacs or a 64 bits emacs, you may
want to add
32 bits Gnu utilities (https://sourceforge.net/projects/ezwinports/files/)
or 64 bits Gnu utilities (http://www.msys2.org/, provides a much better
environment than Cygwin in my opinion)
Or you may want to try the new WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux, as
described by Tim)
which provides a full Ubuntu distribution without the penalty for running
and without the penalty of running a VM.
WSL is pretty impressive and emacs works pretty well once you get a good X
server (like MobaXTerm).