Adam Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> writes:
> Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> writes:
>> Since you're changing the default value, shouldn't you add appropriate
>> values for the :version and :package-version keywords?
> Thanks, I didn't know about these. I set :package-version to 9.1, since
> that should be the next Org release, I guess.
Yep, master-only changes are using 9.1 for :package-version
$ git log -u -G":package-version" maint..master
> I set :version to 26.3 since I guess that will be the next Emacs
> release, although I don't know if it will include Org 9.1. Let me
> know if these need to be changed.
As you can see in the diffs above, master-only changes are using 26.1
for :version. Assuming Org 9.0.* ships with Emacs 26.1, these will be
wrong, but they can be updated all together once 26.2 is released.
>> It'd be good to mention this change in ORG-NEWS as well.
> I should have thought of that. Done.
Thanks. Did you forget to attach the patch?
> I don't know if this still technically qualifies as a tinychange. I've
> sent the email to request the CA form just in case.
I don't know either. How about I apply your *.el changes, and we can
update ORG-NEWS once your assignment comes through?