"Loris Bennett" <loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de> writes: >> I and others have asked a few times why the packages are structured in >> this way, but nobody seems able to provide the rationale. Personally, I >> think we should just have an org package and an org-contrib package >> which depends on the org package. >> >> Tim >> > > So is there a specific reason why there is no 'org-contrib' package > without 'org'?
Yes, that would seem to make more sense.
