On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> Hello, > > Carsten Dominik <domi...@uva.nl> writes: > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have use-cases where I don't like to see the headings numbered but > still > >> want the TOC to be generated. > >> > >> I have this in many of my Org files: > >> > >> #+OPTIONS: num:nil H:4 > >> > >> But after commit bd23781[1], that has stopped working i.e. no TOC is > >> created because of num:nil. > >> > > > > I would see this as a bug - clearly it makes sense to have a TOC without > > numbering. > > > > Nicolas, was this an oversight, or was this change intended? > > The change was intended. The idea was discussed on the ML. You may want > to check the thread. > > This is on par with, e.g., what LaTeX does. > That may be so, but I find that unfortunate. I am really using this feature often. I will go back and take a look at this thread. Can someone tell me what the subject line of that thread was? Carsten > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou >
