Hello, Jens Lange <jens.lange...@gmail.com> writes:
> I understand the dilemma. But then I must ask for a format enhancment. > Before crying out loud please read my argumentation. Why did I create my > own "fancy" markers? Because there is no default way to recreate the > "Textmarker-Experience" - or at least I couldn't find any. All default > emphasis markers recreate what I would call the "Ballpoint-Experience". > This puzzles me because marking text on a piece of paper is one of the most > basic things. Do I have a point here or not? I disagree. Note that I'm not crying out loud, either. Textmarker-Experience is but a fancy way to emphasize some text. It typographically has the same purpose as *bold*, /italic/, _underscore_, ... You can already tweak `org-emphasis-alist' to put, e.g., neon-yellow over bold (or italic, underscole...) text if you want. Just change the face associated to the marker. The point is that Org is, by default, limited to a set of 4 markers (I'm not counting the 2 verbatim markups), for good reasons. I still think this is enough for most purposes. If you have special requirements, e.g., 6 markers, both Org and Emacs provide other ways to add them. None of them should be achieved by tweaking `org-emphasis-alist', though. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
