Hello, Allen Li <vianchielfa...@gmail.com> writes:
> Regarding the behavior of org-insert-todo-heading-respect-content, > bound to C-S-return, consider the following .org file: > > * TODO some task > ** WAITING other task > > If point is on the TODO line, pressing C-S-return yields > > * TODO some task > ** WAITING other task > * WAITING > > When I use C-S-return, I always desire > > * TODO some task > ** WAITING other task > * TODO > > Making C-S-return do this would break backward compatibility, but I > think this behavior is more intuitive. Thoughts? I think the current behaviour is more than likely a bug. The one you propose is indeed better. Would you want to provide a fix for that? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
