Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Again, I may be wrong in thinking disabling this will cause trouble to >> many users. Let's just take a moment to see what users think. > > It will case trouble during the time necessary to read ORG-NEWS > incompatible changes section or ask the mailing list, and then adding > (require 'org-tempo) to their configuration file. I wish I'd be as optimistic as you are and assume every user reads ORG-NEWS! I seriously doubt a majority of users do. Those installing Org from ELPA cannot possibly know where to find ORG-NEWS, Org gives no indication where it lives: IOW, it's not even because users are lazy or what. > It seems nonsensical to let Org handle expansion templates. Dedicated > packages do it way better than what we provide, and the task is really > out of our scope. I can't remember anybody complaining Org's expansion mechanism. > Worse, we would provide two different ways to expand blocks /by > default/. I see it differently. You and Rasmus (and those participating to the discussion) cleanly separated two functionalities: one is to *insert* templates the other one is to *expand* them. M-x org-insert-structure-template RET is good for discovery as it lets users see what templates are availables and <[KEY][TAB] is good for fast inline expansion. Both complete each other IMO, and both deserve to be in Org's core. But again, I might be wrong, I just don't want this to be a discussion between us two :) -- Bastien
