Hello, alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> The manual says: > > If you place the cursor at the beginning or just behind the end > of the displayed text and press <BACKSPACE>, you will remove the > (invisible) bracket at that location. > > The problem for me it that it depends on the way I arrive at those > locations. For example, for '[[xx]]', seen as 'xx' underlined, if I > have the cursor on the right of it and have it go towards the left > just after the second 'x' and press <BACKSPACE>, then the behavior is > as I expect (I see '[[xx]'), but, if I have the cursor on the left and > have it go to towards the right just after the second 'x' and press > <BACKSPACE>, then I see a single underlined 'x' (after a second > <BACKSPACE> I see '[[]]'). > > Is this normal? (tested with emacs -Q with master, with emacs 24.5.1 > and 26.1) Yes, it is normal Emacs behaviour. See (info "(elisp) Invisible Text"). I guess we could clarify the manual. Suggestions welcome. > Incidentally, is there a way to have things like [[xx]] behave as > plain text? Yes, there is. Insert a zero width space after the opening brackets. > (I am not talking about literal links which are still > understood as links.) I have tried 'quote', 'verse', 'verbatim', > 'comment', 'example', and org code block: none work. =[[xx]]= and ~[[xx]]= are not links; try to export them. However, `org-open-at-point' still treats them as such -- see last paragraph in its docstring -- because this was a desirable feature for some users, IIRC. > PS: for me this is not a theoretical issue: In many circumstances I > would like '[[xx]]' instances not behave as links. I would be happy > if I could change the link format (e.g., use {{xx}} instead -- is it > possible? (I fear it is not.) No, you cannot change link syntax, but you don't need to, either. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou