hm. I would have interpreted it as an empty string with a strikethrough, followed by a plus. It makes sense to require 1 or more characters between them though.
Why is +-+ not a - with a strikethrough? Because it is a table line? Or + + is not a space with a strikethrough. I guess there are word boundaries required. I thought it was interesting that ++ + and + ++ show no strikethrough, but ++ ++ does. Evidently a strikethrough on + +. An editor, on the other hand, might want to strikeout excess spaces. It isn't a big deal, I just changed the editmark syntax to avoid clashing with org-syntax. Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Hello, > > John Kitchin <jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes: > >> That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as >> strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That >> was a good hint though. > > IMO, +++ is clearly a plus sign with strike-through. Why would "+" sign > be excluded from strike-through? > > You can use a zero-width space, like +<ZWS>++. > > Regards, -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
