On 11-03-2019 10:35, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Daniele Nicolodi <dani...@grinta.net> writes: > >> On 10/03/2019 11:19, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >>> When in doubt, use the function ~org-link-escape~ in order to turn >>> a link string into its properly escaped form. >>> >>> The old ~org-link-escape~ and ~org-link-unescape~ functions have >>> been renamed into ~org-link-encode~ and ~org-link-decode~. >> >> Aren't those two sentences slightly contradictory? If ~org-link-escape~ >> has been renamed ~org-link-encode~ I think that the later should be >> mentioned in the first sentence. > > The first paragraph is about the new `org-link-escape'. The second one > is about the old `org-link-escape', which has become `org-link-encode'. > Is that clearer?
I may have understood what you mean now. At the first read I understood that org-link-escape should be used to turn strings into link form, and that it has been renamed into org-link-encode, thus the function that should be used to turn strings into valid links is org-link-encode. What you meant is that the old org-link-escape is now org-link-encode and a new function with the same name has been introduced. Cheers, Dan
