Hi Guilherme,
Guilherme Passos <gpp...@hotmail.com> writes:
> In ox-latex.el, line 1189, org-latex-pdf-process uses '(%bib %b) for
> expanding the bibliography. However, this incorrectly expands as
> '(BIBFILEib BIBFILE), instead of '(BIBPROCESS BIBFILE) as intended,
> defining the process of calling the bibliography.
>
> As can be seen in line 3635, the correct command for the bibprocess is
> %B, not %bib. The documentation is also wrong in lines 1137 and 1160
> for saying that %bib is the correct command.
I don't use ox-latex.el and may be missing something, but looking at the
code I think %bib, as described by the docstring of
org-latex-pdf-process, is intended.
When %bib was added in 74da3bc10 (ox-latex: Support arbitrary
bibtex-like program, 2015-07-08), it appears that it was working as
documented. But with the switch to using format-spec internally in
f6187deca (ox-latex: Small refactor, 2015-09-13), the field was changed
from %bib to %bibtex. Based on the commit message, I don't think that
was intentional.
> The only thing necessary is to replace %bib with %B in those lines.
Given the situation I described above, I think the options are
* change %bib to %B (your suggestion) and remove the "bib" part from
the regexp in org-latex-compile because keeping it around would be
confusing
* update the documentation and type in org-latex-pdf-process to use
%bibtex
* update the regexp in org-latex-compile to match "bib", not "bibtex"
The last one seems preferable to me, assuming the change from %bib to
%bibtex was an oversight. What do you think?
> Should I send a patch?
Yes, please.
--
Kyle
