Hello, Ken Mankoff <mank...@gmail.com> writes:
> Can you provide a more obvious hint? :) I don't have enough time to help you more on that, sorry. I didn't even look closely to the issue you're encountering. Hopefully, someone else on the ML can provide guidance on it. > I've read the documentation on called-interactively-p but have not had > success yet with that function. The bottom of that doc string suggests > this is not an appropriate use for it. Indeed. > I've read the manual part on "Distinguish Interactive Calls"[1] but > working through those examples I can't get deeper called functions to > know if the nth-parent was called interactively or not. IMO, this is what you shouldn't try to do: mess with the call stack. This sounds like a wrong approach to the problem. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
