Hi Michael, Michael Dickens <michael.dick...@affirm.com> writes:
> You could argue that this is expected behavior and the priority > should go after the to-do state, but IMO it should work either way > because it can still be unambiguously parsed. Org sets a few syntactic rules, the position of the priority cookie right _after_ the TODO keyword is one of them which we don't want to change, as it makes it easier for everyone to read Org files. Well, because a different syntax can be unambiguously parsed does not mean we should use this different syntax. Best, -- Bastien
