Hi, On Wed, Feb 12, 2020, 15:28 Adam Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> wrote:
> Hi Bastien, > > Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: > > > I still find it strange to keep functions that are used nowhere in the > > Org's core--except of course for functions that explicitely mention as > > usable by the user (e.g. `org-clock-persistence-insinuate'.) > [snip] And it's in org.el, so it's in Org's > "core", right? I guess we're thinking in different terms. > > Inserting a subheading or subitem is a very common operation in an > outlining and list-making tool, so it would seem like a significant > regression to remove it. > I think there's an implied -and usually misleading‐ correlation between the importance of a function and the count of self-references -meaning uses in the defining package- shown from help buffers. It would be cool to see uses tracked as we byte-compile or something. I'm not opposed to reorganizing the code, of course, as long as it > remains loaded as a command when org-mode is activated. > I'm a fan of interactive methods in obvious, easy to reach places.
