Hi Jack, Jack Kamm <jackk...@gmail.com> writes:
>> I've seen you update the NEWS entry, which is good: is there a way to >> present the enhancements in the "* New features" section? If you feel >> like it, please advertize the enhancements there too. > > Given John's feedback, I now think it's better to put off this change to > 9.5, if at all. So instead of updating NEWS, I'd prefer to revert this > commit for now. Sorry for the noise! Looking forward to 9.4. Sure, I just reverted the commit. This discussion made me realize that the various Babel backends may have different approaches wrt evaluating blocks, returning output and results, interpreting empty output/result, etc. The mere notion of a "session" may differ from one language to another. I wish we can push for more consistency here--perhaps the first stop would be (1) to pick major backends and (2) document their behaviors. I'm sure this could help enhancing Org babel code too. Thanks, -- Bastien
