Hi Jack, Jack Kamm <jackk...@gmail.com> writes:
> Stefan Nobis <stefan...@snobis.de> writes: > >> What about a third collection option 'none' and make this the default? > > A variant on this idea, would be to instead have the third collection > option be 'default', which would stand for a language-specific > default. For example, ":results default" could be equivalent to > ":results output" for shell blocks, but equivalent to ":results value" > for emacs-lisp blocks. Before exploring other collection options, I think we should document the current state of the default for the main Babel languages. This will give us an idea on what to use as the default. -- Bastien
