Hello, denis.maier.li...@mailbox.org writes:
> Bruce has already sent a link to Pandoc's org-mode Reader where you > can find the citation modes. The standard (markdown) implementation > can be found here: > https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/blob/f2b337768e95c8903f65e597f7d8cd81938dacc3/src/Text/Pandoc/Readers/Markdown.hs > Thank you. > Anyway, currently there are basically three modes: > - NormalCitation > - SuppressAuthor > - AuthorInText [...] > So: > [@doe] => NormalCitation > [-@doe] => SuppressAuthor > @doe argues ... => AuthorInText > -@doe [23] => SuppressAuthor Let's assume Org implements SuppressAuthor as "-@doe", so far it has: | Syntax | Mode | Sample output | |---------------------------+---------------------------------+---------------| | @doe or [cite:@doe] | AuthorInText | Doe (2020) | | -@doe or [cite:-@doe] | AuthorInText + SuppressAuthor | (2020) | | [@doe] or [(cite):@doe] | NormalCitation | (Doe, 2020) | | [-@doe] or [(cite):-@doe] | NormalCitation + SuppressAuthor | (2020) | So, we could mix suppress author with some other style, although this seems useless for the time being. Current syntax is not great because it is ad-hoc, and not very future-proof, if new modes appear. Also, the "(cite)" key is a bit mouthful, "citep" might have been prettier. Anyway, is it complete enough? Also, there is some ambiguity between modes applying reference-wise, i.e., "suppress author", and modes applying to the whole reference, i.e., NormalCitation and AuthorInText. Therefore, I'm wondering: has the following any meaning? [cite: -@doe; @foo] [(cite): -@doe; @foo] > Depending on CSL's future development there might well be other > citations modes. I personally think there's much to learn from > biblatex, but that's a different debate... As a related node, from Biblatex, we may also need, e.g., [(Cite):...], but this was rejected for some reason a long time ago. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
