Ah, great, thanks! I have been looking at the wrong node all the time.
However, the manual node you're pointing to disagrees with the claim that those are equivalent: >If you need both a repeater and a special warning period in a deadline >entry, the repeater should come first and the warning period last > DEADLINE: <2005-10-01 Sat +1m -3d> However, the manual may be incomplete. Thank you, problem seems to be solved. Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> 於 2020年4月30日 週四 13:02 寫道： > Vladimir Nikishkin <lockyw...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I need to pay a fee by every 28th of the month, and I want this task > > to show up in the agenda from the 20th of the next not paid month. > > > > What's the proper DEADLINE format? > > > > DEADLINE: <2020-02-28 Sun .+1m -10d> ? > > DEADLINE: <2020-02-28 Sun -10d .+1m> ? > > Those are equivalent. Though you might consider whether you'd prefer > '+' or '++' for this rather than '.+'. See (info "(org)Repeated tasks") > if you're not aware of the differences. > > And note that a utility like datefudge or libfaketime is useful for > testing these sorts of things out. For example: > > $ datefudge "2020-02-18" emacs [...] >
