> I don't have a strong opinion here. > > Why do you think it would it be a better as a default?
It seems that other people expect it to be default [1]. Also, I am using org-attach heavily in my workflows. Most of the time I found myself inserting the link to attachment right after attaching a file. Finally, it do not see any drawback adding the link to history vs not adding. I personally would prefer 'attached as a default, but it is mostly because I use org-attach already and attach: link would be shorter. Probably, 'file as default is safer if the user changes the :DIR: property for some reason. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/ihzh9r/orgmode_quicker_way_to_create_link_to_attachment/ > Feel free to propose a patch for this and the suggested switch, we can > apply it after Org 9.4. I will add it to my todo list. This should be lower priority than org-fold.el Best, Ihor Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: > Hi Ihor, > > Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> writes: > >> The default value of org-attach-store-link-p is nil for now. >> Would it make more sense to set it to something else (say, 'attach)? >> I believe that 'attach or t would be better as a default. >> >> Thoughts? > > I don't have a strong opinion here. > > Why do you think it would it be a better as a default? > >> Also, the docstring does not mention that there may be several different >> non-nil values. It is only reflected in the :type field of defcustom. > > Feel free to propose a patch for this and the suggested switch, we can > apply it after Org 9.4. > > Best, > > -- > Bastien
