Kyle Meyer writes: > So, given ee3c3b554 doesn't appear to resolve the initial issue and > introduces its own, I'm in favor of reverting ee3c3b554. I'll plan to > do so in a day or two if I don't hear objections.
Done in e8070d71a.
Kyle Meyer writes: > So, given ee3c3b554 doesn't appear to resolve the initial issue and > introduces its own, I'm in favor of reverting ee3c3b554. I'll plan to > do so in a day or two if I don't hear objections.
Done in e8070d71a.