Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> writes:
Asa Zeren <[email protected]> writes:
Also another note is that the worg syntax document does begin
to specify
this. My point is to bring this out into a separate document.
Why should this be in a separate document? The obvious place for
a
standard is worg, and the way forward is to improve what’s
there.
I'll try to avoid interpreting others words for them :P but my
take is
that it while documents like the worg syntax document are
fantastic, we
may want to add a bit more into a single more comprehensive
document.
I have a suggestion in this regard. #+include
Why not have the best of both worlds :P
--
Timothy
