On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:29:06AM +0800, TEC wrote: > > > However Worg is a key component because it's community maintained > > documentation. Not just anyone can upload to the main site, but Worg > > is as "wiki" as we have. As an integral part of the community > > supported documentation I thought it should be in the header. > > I do see your point. I think in order to warrant being presented as a > one-step-from-the-homepage target it would be good to tidy up the Worg > homepage.
That's a valid criticism. Worg's main page could use an update to look more like the main site. Does Worg's landing page updates need to be addressed before we link to it in the header? Any improvements to Worg will require additional volunteer efforts and will take some time. Not linking it as an important part of the Org site could contribute to continued inattention. I leave it up to you. I value your work revamping the main site, and you are clearly much more skilled in HTML presentation of information than I. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Russell Adams rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/ Fingerprint: 1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3
