Hi Julian, thanks for your comment. "Julian M. Burgos" <julian.bur...@hafogvatn.is> writes:
> Thank you, although I tested your functions and compared with the > original org-tree-to-indirect-buffer, the only difference I see is > that your function creates a new exwm workspace. The original function > already creates indirect buffers with their own names (using a slash > instead of the double colons). Or I am missing something? org-tree-to-indirect-buffer creates a new buffer, but (as far as I know) does not allow accumulating buffers. In other words, you cannot have several isolated trees at the time. In this method it just occurred to me to configure org-indirect-buffer-display as new-frame and take advantage of EXWM frame management. Best regards, Juan Manuel
