* sorry for the typo. I meant "...n columns x n rows..." Juan Manuel Macías <maciasch...@posteo.net> writes:
> Anyway, I suspect that Org tables are not originally intended for such a > 'literary' content :-) ... LaTeX tabular(x) environment and Org tables > have in common that they are plain text, but that’s where the > similarities end. Org tables are visual (close to the WYSIWYG concept), > which is why they are wonderful when it comes to mere data tables (and n > files x n rows). The LaTeX tabular environment is crude, it is not > 'visual' (except for the facilities provided by the editor), and when > the table becomes large and complex it can be a torture working in > there... So perhaps (IMHO) the solution to edit a cell in a dedicated > buffer could be the least traumatic in complex cells, in case one wants > to avoid going crazy by editing this kind of huge and literary tables in > LaTeX ;-)
