Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes:
> This distinction is wrong, and we should treat "suppress-author" as a > citation style instead. > > The result would be: > > [cite/supress-author:doe19;doe20] > > Or even can keep the shorthand: > > [cite/-:doe19;doe20] > > In fact, with the change, could even remove it entirely We introduced :suppress-author because someone requested it at some point. I don't remember who, but it may be worth asking that person. I think there are two points to consider before removing suppress-author syntax: 1. does it make sense to apply it independently on references within a full citation? 2. does it make sense to apply it on top of another style? If both answers are no, this can definitely go away. > Or even can keep the shorthand: > > [cite/-:doe19;doe20] Note that Org Citation library does not recognize styles. It is up to the processor to interpret it as a short-hand for "suppress-author". Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
