Hi Timothy, thanks for your answer and your willingness to help here, much appreciated.
Timothy <tecos...@gmail.com> writes: > I also think that regardless it would be good to put out a call asking > if anyone else is interested/willing to do this: I'm going to be busy > sometimes, a reduced workload is clearly preferable, and less should > slip through the cracks :) Sure. We can certainly have two or more contributor stewards. > I'm happy to document this, but I don't know what expectations should be > set. I think this is a matter that should be decided by consensus among > the current/active maintainers. I started something here: https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#what-can-I-expect Please adapt along your own commitment and expectations. >> (4) is perhaps the most daunting task: I even think we could have >> someone only dedicated to this very important task. Just count the >> number of times Nicolas says "I cannot reproduce this." Each time, >> there is a real bug that is *not* fixed... > > Mmmm, even if I say I'm willing to do this, I suspect this is something > I'd by nature push off enough that I'd frequently forget about this 😅. Sure -- also, this is time consuming and probably requires someone to focus just on this. I will raise a call for help for this. > This is how I see this two. As I indicated at the start, I'm happy to do > this, but I think a second person would help ensure that nobody slips > through the cracks. Great! Thanks a lot.
