On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:05 AM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> Your document doesn't contain a "#+print_bibliography" keyword. It is
> responsible for adding the "\\bibliography{...}" macro. I don't think it
> is possible to produce a PDF without it.
I paste my input/output below.
Shouldn't the output include ...
\bibliography{test}
...?
--- source ---
[cite/text/alt:see ;@einstein]
[cite//alt/caps:@einstein]
[cite//full:@einstein]
[cite//caps:@einstein]
#+print_bibliography
#+cite_export: natbib plainnat
#+bibliography_export: natbib
#+bibliography: test.bib
--- results ---
% Created 2021-05-06 Thu 09:04
% Intended LaTeX compiler: lualatex
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{grffile}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{rotating}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{capt-of}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\author{Bruce D'Arcus}
\date{\today}
\title{}
\hypersetup{
pdfauthor={Bruce D'Arcus},
pdftitle={},
pdfkeywords={},
pdfsubject={},
pdfcreator={Emacs 27.2 (Org mode 9.4.5)},
pdflang={English}}
\usepackage[]{natbib}
\begin{document}
\tableofcontents
\citealt{einstein}
\Citealp{einstein}
\citep*{einstein}
\Citep{einstein}
\#+print\textsubscript{bibliography}
\end{document}
